FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

FZ BIBLE 23/30 UNIVERSES CASSETTES (5TH ACC)

***********************************************

CONTENTS: Universes Cassettes (the 5th Advanced Clinical Course)

32 Cassettes containing 33 lectures plus Introduction and Appendix.
The first lecture is also the final lecture of the 4th ACC and is
numbered 4ACC-72. Posted in 30 files ("+" used where a second item
is in the same file.)

01. ..... Introduction
+ 4ACC-72 29 MAR 54 EVOLUTION AND USE OF SELF ANALYSIS
02. 5ACC-01 30 MAR 54 UNIVERSES
03. 5ACC-02 31 MAR 54 SIMPLE PROCESSES
04. 5ACC-03 1 APR 54 BASIC SIMPLE PROCEDURES
05. 5ACC-04 2 APR 54 PRESENCE OF AN AUDITOR 
06. 5ACC-05 5 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: SAFE PLACE FOR THINGS
+ ..... APPENDIX
07. 5ACC-06 6 APR 54 LECTURE: UNIVERSES
08. 5ACC-07 7 APR 54 UNIVERSE: BASIC DEFINITIONS
09. 5ACC-08 8 APR 54 UNIVERSE: PROCESSES, EXPERIENCE
10. 5ACC-09 9 APR 54 UNIVERSE: CONDITIONS OF THE MIND AND REMEDIES
11. 5ACC-10 12 APR 54 UNIVERSE: CHANGE AND REHABILITATION
12. 5ACC-11 13 APR 54 UNIVERSE: MANIFESTATION
13. 5ACC-12 14 APR 54 SOP 8-D
14. 5ACC-13 15 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: EXTERIORIZATION AND STABILIZATION
+ 5ACC-13B 15 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: CERTAINTY ASSESSMENT
15. 5ACC-14 16 APR 54 SOP 8-D: LECTURE
16. 5ACC-15 19 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: UNIVERSE ASSESSMENT
+ 5ACC-15B 19 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: AREA ASSESSMENT
17. 5ACC-16 20 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: REMEDYING HAVINGNESS
+ GP-Spec 21 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: REACH FOR PRESENT TIME
18. 5ACC-17 21 APR 54 ELEMENTS OF AUDITING
19. 5ACC-18 22 APR 54 SOP 8-DA
20. 5ACC-19 23 APR 54 SOP 8-DB
21. 5ACC-20 26 APR 54 GENERAL HANDLING OF A PC
22. 5ACC-21 27 APR 54 ANCHOR POINTS AND SPACE
23. 5ACC-22 28 APR 54 SPACE AND HAVINGNESS
24. 5ACC-23 29 APR 54 SPACE
25. 5ACC-24 30 APR 54 SOP 8-DA THROUGH SOP 80-DH
26. 5ACC-25 3 MAY 54 VIEWPOINT STRAIGHTWIRE
27. 5ACC-26 4 MAY 54 BE, DO, HAVE STRAIGHTWIRE
28. 5ACC-27 5 MAY 54 EFFICACY OF PROCESSES
29. 5ACC-28 6 MAY 54 ANATOMY OF UNIVERSES
30. 5ACC-29 7 MAY 54 ENERGY - EXTERIORIZATION


**************************************************

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians, 
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. 

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************


UNIVERSES (5th ACC) file 23/30 (tape 25):

Transcript of Taped Lecture by L. Ron Hubbard 

5ACC-22 - 5404C28 

Number 25 of "Universes and the War between Theta and Mest" 
cassettes.


SPACE AND HAVINGNESS

A lecture given on 28 April 1954


I would like to give you today a very fast summary of goals
in auditing as appertain to what the auditor does. What
does an auditor do to achieve what result?

Well, recently I was able to codify what an auditor was
doing regardless of how many interesting commands he might
give.

You see, he's only trying to handle three things: the
postulates of the individual, the space of the individual
and the having of the individual, as appertain to earlier
processes and so forth. He's just trying to handle these
three things.

Now, you say, "Where's the energy?" Well, that's the only
place where an auditor gets into trouble - when he starts to
handle energy. I can tell you from very long experience
that any auditor who begins to handle energy as such is in
for a long and arduous time which is going to wind his
preclear up way downscale. Any auditor who begins to handle
energy as such - in other words, running concepts out of
energy - is so limited that if pursued any length of time
will depress the tone of your preclear. Running flows
- outflows and inflows, as such - if continued any length of
time, will definitely depress the tone of your preclear.
And neither one of these last two will wind up in a cleared
individual.

Now, the goal of the auditor is to clear somebody.
Minimumly, give him a definite release on some specific
mental problem or psychosomatic illness. Minimally. His
goal is to clear this person, and let's redefine Clear
slightly just by saying that we put this individual into
such a state of ability that he can exteriorize and
interiorize into anything and everything he wishes, and so
that he can communicate ably with something or nothing with
no qualms and without repercussion. Actually, that's quite
a goal.

All right. But that leaves us three things to handle -
there is a fourth thing, but this is a slightly different
category - three things to handle in any basic process that
you happen to use. And I don't care now whether you're
using an old, ancient, antique, rickety process or a
brand-new, shiny one - either way, you're just handling three
things: thought (which is to say postulates, the ability
to think, the ability to change the mind, the ability to
make a postulate, to make a statement - that one), space and
havingness. One, two, three.

Now, let's see why we handle postulates. In the final
analysis, everything is a postulate. Everything came about
by postulates. We just could make postulates the end-all
of everything, and we're very safe on it. Everything
rationalizes out very nicely. And postulates if treated as
a topflight goal bring about a very, very fine condition on
the part of the preclear.

What are you trying to get him to do, in essence? Change
his mind. He has a bad leg, he's crippled; you won't get
that leg well unless he changes his mind about having to
have a bad leg. Believe me, you won't. The doctors can saw
and hew and use axes and materia medica and Morris
Fishbeins and everything else on him, and by George, his
leg will not get well until he has made up his mind for his
leg to get well.

You're not going to sneak up on a preclear, in other words,
and suddenly say "abracadabra" or something of the sort and
have him get entirely well unless you at the same time are
willing to accept him in his entirety into your universe
and absolutely eat him and engulf him and drown all the
self-determinism which he has.

Now, you can make him a perfect specimen, just like a
sculptor, you know, can model the perfect statue. You can
just engulf him in your universe and bing - you got him. 
A great faith healer has to do this. No objection to you
practicing faith healing or grabbing off as many
individuals as you like. It's all fair game in this
universe. But remember this, that it is not quite what
we're doing. And if you were to get to a state where you
did directed healing without the knowledge or consent of
the person you were healing, remember that it is necessary
to actually drag him into your universe lock, stock and
barrel - legs, ears, tibias, medulla oblongata, thetan,
facsimiles and all the rest of it - and monitor him thereafter.

This, in essence, is the beginning of any religious cult.
Somebody comes along who embracively heals a number of
people. He yanks them into his universe, and the next
thing you know we have a cult. When somebody comes along
and says to you, "Dianetics and Scientology is a cult,"
this is a slight misnomer. Although I yank you into my
universe to beat some facts into your heads, it's only just
long enough to boot you the hell out and say, "Stand on
your own two feet!" Now there's, in essence, the slight
difference here. Now, when we're working with processes
which are working badly in the hands of auditors you find
more people going into the Scientology universe than come
out. It's your duty as an auditor to keep the population
stable. If you take them in, throw them out. Well, the way
you throw them out is, of course, to restore their
self-determinism. And actually, this is the only way you'll
ever make anybody happy and able and well.

All right. Now let's take these methods and find out that
in postulates there's a slight hooker - just a slight
one - which is to say there is an axiom to this effect: The
postulate of a god of a universe is effective in that
universe. Corollary: A universe is affected only by the
postulates of the god of that universe. You understand
that, now? I mean, that's a very simple one.

So that actually Universe Processing comes under the
heading of one of these three I have mentioned: postulates.
Now, you may think you're handling space and havingness
and everything else and you may have to detour into these
things in order to separate out universes, but at the same
time you're actually trying to do what? You're trying to
get the individual, very directly, quite directly, to stop
running on Mama's postulates and start running on his own
postulates. In other words, stop existing in Mama's space
and live in his own space. And your effort, of course, is
naturally to make his postulates effective in his own
universe, which reverses the condition you find him in,
which is to say Mama's postulates effective in Mama's
universe in which he dwelleth. He has already joined a cult
there.

Now, as we come down the line and look over these three
things, we find out that any process - regardless of how
artful, how interesting, how demanding of a preclear and
so forth - is as effective, is as effective, as the auditor
pays attention, then, to these three items. And if he goes
astray, if he starts working with energy as such, if he
starts running concepts as such, if he dives in and runs
"Ruddy Rod Processing"... Invented recently down in
Alabama. You take a rod and shove it through the preclear
and if it comes out the other end, why, you have a rod
back. It has Freudian significance.

Anyway, the main difficulty that an auditor runs into is
departing from these basics. Now, I don't say there won't
be simpler basics someday, but I certainly tell you that at
this time, and for the last couple of years, when any
process departed very far from these rudimentary things, it
failed.

Now, what do we have when we have a very clever, fast,
witty, penetrating, sensitive auditor? What do we
have? - basically, if he's going to get any results. We 
have somebody who is working with postulates, space and
havingness. I don't care how witty he gets. But supposing
we have a very witty and a sensitive and a far-reaching
auditor who is getting no results - I mean, oh my, can he
stir up a commotion with this case. Oh, boy, he can just
stir up a terrific commotion with the case. Well, case
doesn't get well. What happens? He is not using
postulates, space and havingness.

Now, let's take those last two as a highly specialized
target. Let's just take those two. Let's take space and
havingness. And let's regard that as a relatively
lower-echelon process, since it is junior to postulates,
and let's see how we weave it in and out of a case so as to
produce a remarked recovery on the part of the case.

The mechanics involved here are those of space and havingness. 
As you know, space is a viewpoint of dimension. Havingness is 
time. Havingness as an object is condensed space.

Now, of course, you can come along and say, "What do you
mean? Condensed space? I mean, there's particles there."
Well, all right. Just for purposes of argument because
you've hit your head several times on particles that you
agreed to, we will say yes, there are particles there.
We'll be very practical and say the number of nuclear
physicists who have gone crazy studying particles
definitely determined to us that particles exist. This
proves it.

Actually, by the way, the nuclear physicist who continues
to study particles on and on and on and on, is reaching
further and further and further into a limbo of untruth.
And he will eventually get stuck in deep. Because he's
actually looking at something which, the harder he looks,
further reduces toward nothing. You know, they at first
were only going to split up the bread. Then after a while
they were going to split up the chemical substances that
went up to make the bread, you know - take the compounds
apart. And they got the compounds apart, so they started
taking complex molecules apart. And then they started
taking these apart and they found out they were looking at
atoms. And so they one day started to take atoms apart, and
they were just as happy as could be because, by golly, they
had split the atom, they had taken it apart, they had
thrown it into its component parts. And then, by God,
somebody had to split an electron! They can, today, split
electrons and protons. And also they have found neutrons
and positrons and mygoditrons and whatnextitrons.

And this is a great difficulty for a nuclear physicist.
What's he doing? He's going down this dwindling path toward
zero, all the while firmly believing he's looking at
something. You see, there's nothing quite as convinced as
the nuclear physicist believing he's looking at something.
And of course he finds nothing. And he finds himself unable
to tolerate this idea of getting clear down to the bottom
and finding nothing, so he takes the alternate, sometimes
the happier choice, and simply goes mad. He stands up like
Oppy did the other day - Oppenheimer - and says to the United
States government, "Thou shalt not make an H-bomb."
Bye-bye, Oppenheimer. We've picked your brains dry, and we
have an English professor who studied some of your work in
the early days, and we are now making an H-bomb with this
English professor. Of course, if it explodes and leaves a
hole where Earth was, that's of course not your
responsibility, Oppenheimer. You have no slightest stock in
Earth at all. So sooner or later down the line a nuclear
physicist tries to pull out. He has to, because he is into
the midst of an imponderable situation. He is looking for
the particle and he can't find it. And that's the essence.

What is the basic particle? The basic particle is zero. And
that makes just a lot more sense than any formula, by the
way, in quantum mechanics.

Now, an auditor who goes along firmly believing in MEST
universe barriers and so forth, is of course, quite sane.
He can recognize these things for what they are and use
them and so forth, and live his workaday life in them, and
get along just splendidly. But when he introduces into his
processing the idea that a particle actually exists, he
gets into trouble.

We don't even have to go out on a long excursion for this.
When he thinks in terms of condensing or uncondensing - that
is to say, condensing or expanding space - and thinks of
condensing space in terms of havingness and expanding space
in terms of nothingness, he succeeds with a case.

What, in essence, is occurring as he processes this case?
Now, let's just look at a case and you come much closer to
home with what I'm talking about. I'm not wandering around
very far from what you're doing. We say to a person, "Walk
around the room and spot some spots in space." Then we say
to him, "All right, now look around and find some places
where you are not." Or we ask him, "Get some places where
your mother is safe," or any one of these things - spots in
space.

What are you doing to this boy? Your preclear is in a state
of mind quite ordinarily and usually which brings him to
believe that he can no longer create. Until he gets over
this - and he just gets over it in the natural course of
processing - until he gets over this, he keeps handling the
condensed space which he already has in stock. So what's he do?

He says around here, "Condensed space, you know, that's
havingness." You take out eight (quote) "anchor points"
(unquote) and pull them all together down to a point, you
have a heavier mass. It's a heavier mass because you
condense space - and don't think that space won't uncondense.
It sure will, because it's put together with the postulate
"condense." So naturally it'll uncondense.

So you ask this fellow, "Spot these spots in space" - bing,
bing, bing, bing, bing. And if you kept this up for quite a
while, all of a sudden he'd go wrrr-wrrr-wrrr-wrrmm-wrrmm -
boil-off.

What did you do to him? You uncondensed his stock of
havingness. You looked up on the shelf; and you said, "Now,
let's see. You've got this and this and this. Well, we will
just take the soda crackers apart and we'll take this apart
and we'll take that apart and we'll take something else
apart and something else apart." And then don't look at him
very surprised and say, "What! All the shelves are empty?"
Because, naturally, they are - you emptied them. By doing
what? By directing his attention into space. You said,
"Space, space, space, space. Spot space, spot space, spot
space, spot space." I don't care what process you were
using, they boil down to these two processes, which is:
spot space, condense space. Either way.

All right. Now, our next thing. You say to this boy - well,
he starts to boil off because you've done this - now you
say to him, "Put out eight anchor points marking the
corners of a cube and bring them in." (Either on himself as
a thetan or on his body.) "Put out eight more. Bring them
in. Eight more. Bring them in. Eight new ones. Bring them
in. Eight new ones. Bring them in. Eight new ones. Bring
them in. Eight new ones. Bring them in. Eight..." What are
you doing? You're condensing space.

Well, you went out here and you said, "Spot, spot, spot,
spot," you see? And that uncondense, uncondense, uncondense, 
uncondense.

All right. What had you better do next? You better tell
him, "Condense, condense, condense, condense, condense."
Now, this is not very difficult. As we weave through all of
processing, we discover that in the Grand Tour we handle
both havingness and space because we put people into
objects which they've already consented exist.

But by and large, we're handling space, really. And we
exteriorize them, interiorize them, exteriorize them,
interiorize them - boy, you're putting them across a
distance. You're saying "Space, space, space, space, space"
and all of a sudden your boy goes nyarrrrrr. He feels
groggy, he feels unhappy, he's liable to come up at last
and say, "You know, I'm nothing but a thought." He's so sad
about this.

Now, when you put somebody, then, through something like
the Grand Tour - remember. You process him on the Grand Tour
for a couple, three minutes, you say, "Put up eight anchor
points. Pull them in on yourself. Eight more; pull them in
on yourself. Eight more; pull them in on yourself. Eight
more; pull them in on yourself Okay. Mars. Sun. Moon."
Start changing space on him again.

He'll wear that havingness out. Now, it actually isn't true
that he really needs the energy in order to make the
circuit, but until you get him completely out of every
foreign universe he's in, the postulates of the gods of
those universes, such as "There must be energy," will
continue to be effective upon him. And as long as the
postulate "There must be energy" is effective upon this
preclear, you had better jolly well remedy his havingness.

All right. Let's look over now and see how many different
ways this could possibly apply. Change of space. You say,
"Be in your childhood home. Be in the room. Childhood home,
room, childhood home, room, childhood home, room, child..." 
- rrrwrrrrwrrrrwrrrwrrrwrr.

What did you do? You just says, "Make space. Make space.
Make space. Make space. Make space." And in the state you
found him in, this started to uncondense his bank. After a
while he will actually just start creating the space he's
making out there. He isn't running on the same energy.

And you don't have to signalize the moment when he starts
to do this. But as you do this, you run him out of his
store of energy. Now, you'd certainly better fix him up by
remedying his havingness.

You say, "All right." Get something that he can accept and
pull them in. Something he can accept, pull them in.

All right. Now let's take something else that's very
interesting about this. Let's take the most occluded case
there is and try to run Change of Space on him. You know,
let's take a Resistive XIX. And we say to this boy, "Locate
the center of the room." Nyarrrrrrr - boom! What did you do?
That's just the first step, and you just indicated one
piece of space and he started to get groggy and he almost
became sick at his stomach.

Now, you see, he's just a little bit worse off than
everybody else, you know. He really can't create, he is on
the center of that create-survive-destroy curve. Everything 
he has he got from somewhere else, he thinks. He can't create
anything. He can only make things persist, and all of a
sudden you made some of his havingness unpersist. Just, you
know, you said, "Locate the center of the room." This was
enough. He'll start to get a little bit queasy on you. And
I'm talking about a fellow who is really bad off.

Now theoretically, there are cases that you could say to
"Locate the center of the room," and they started to do
so, they would become violently sick at their stomachs and
begin to throw up. What would happen in such a case?

Well, boy, you just had somebody whose havingness was all
the way run out and who couldn't have any space anyway, and
the second that you gave him the slightest bit of space his
havingness reduced way below tolerance.

Well, what sort of state must he be in from day to day? You
mean every time, any time he looks out into an emptiness of
any kind, any time he has to recognize an emptiness he will
be very tense and possibly get sick at his stomach.

But this individual, if he got sick at just recognizing the
center of the room, must be in a chronic state of being ill
and tense. His havingness is continually reduced very close
to nothing when he feels he must have a great deal of it.
His time will be upset, he will stick all over the time
track, he will stick in any engram. If you just tell him
about an engram - you say, "All right. There's an incident 
on the track called The Jiggler. And it goes this way and it
goes that way," and the fellow says, "Slllrrrrp!" He's in
restimulation now. See, any energy is better than no energy.

All right. Now, just look at this. Just make this a rule in
your auditing. If you make this a rule in your auditing,
the number of preclears that you will snap back to battery
will just be uncounted. Because you will have greater and
greater successes in your auditing, regardless what
processes you're using. If you're just using this basic of
all processes... You say... any time you say to this
fellow, "Space, space, space, space," keep your eye on him.
You say, "Space, space, space, space." You've got him on
the E-Meter or you're keeping your eye on him. Your E-Meter
starts to stick, or his body twitches slightly, or he looks
a little more tense, or his face starts to screw up and
become rather uncomfortable one way or the other, or
muscular tension lines anywhere in the face begin to
tighten - you know you have gone far enough, auditor.

You've said, "Space, space, space, space. Space, space,
space, space. Space, space, space" - uh-oh; here we hit it.
Thhuu! Now, you could go on with this fellow and say,
"Space, space, space, space, space," and he'd start doing
this: "Nrrr. Nrrr. Nrrr. All of a sudden I've got to get
out of here!" Bing! He'll fly out of the chair on you.
He'll jump up in the session. Any excuse you possibly want
to list he'll give you, but the basic one is, is you just
started to tear apart too much havingness and this was very
uncomfortable to him, so away he went or he got very tense
or his legs got very restless or he began to shudder, and
his attention went right straight off of what you were doing.

Why did it do that? Well, you just said, "Space, space,
space, space," which you might as well have said, "Unhave,
unhave, unhave, unhave, unhave, unhave... Oh, you got a
loss in restimulation now. Well, unhave some more, unhave,
unhave.. " - he's dying! You've just... obviously you're
saying to him every time you say, "Another spot in space,"
you're saying to him, "Die a little more. Okay. Now,
another spot in space. Die a little more, now." Same thing.

Well, this condition is something an auditor must watch. If
he's going to watch anything about a preclear, he should
watch that condition. He doesn't have to be sensitive to
the preclear's moods and so forth. He just knows how much
havingness this preclear has or hasn't.

Well, now let's take a look at havingness. And let's find
we have a Step 89 or something, and you know that there's
always something that this fellow can have. And here we get
into Acceptance Level Processing. I call your attention to
the PABs and Acceptance Level Processing, and this is how
it is used in the Remedy of Havingness.

We get him to get something which is obviously acceptable
to him. We say this fellow seems to be having an awful lot
of trouble, for instance - seems to be having a lot of
trouble with his teeth. Bad teeth are acceptable to him.
He's got a twisted arm of some kind or another - you know,
his arm is not quite right. Well, a bad arm is acceptable
to him. And you know, he can actually get mock-ups of it.

So what do you do? I don't care how thin the mock-up is.
And boy, you should get this: Don't ever worry if your
preclear's mock-ups are thin and unsubstantial and he's
uncertain of them. This is one place where certainty
doesn't apply. Just one place where it doesn't apply. It
doesn't matter how thin these mock-ups are. Yes, you could
get other things that might make them a little bit thicker,
and so forth, but all this will take place in due course.
We take this preclear, and let's say he's got a twisted
arm - we'll just have him get a twisted arm. We'll just have
him get an arm that is more twisted than his arm. This is
even therapeutic for the arm.

But we're not interested in whether it's therapeutic for
the arm or not; we're just trying to remedy this fellow's
havingness. That's the only reason. And obviously, we've
got to be able to get some energy into him that he can
accept. So, we'll have to get something he can mock up. But
you say he's totally occluded and can't mock up anything.
Oh, yes, he can mock up something. And there's where an
auditor has to get clever. He has to look at the person and
actually tell the person what he can mock up. He looks at
the person, he sees so-and-so, and so-and-so, and
so-and-so, and "Well," he says, "now let's see if we can't
get a mock-up of something or other."

Now, actually, he could put it on the E-Meter and name a
number of subjects and get a bop, and go ahead and have the
preclear mock that up. He would be able to.

But a good auditor hasn't got time to fool with that. He
just looks at the preclear, finds this preclear... He
knows what's wrong with the preclear anyhow. Preclear has
told him. He's already had a little conversation with the
preclear. And he finds out this fellow has a... you know,
he's kind of sick at his stomach a lot of the time. You
know, upset stomach.

Well, what's the auditor do? When he remedies havingness on
this preclear the first step that he had better take is a
stomach that is sick. "Let's mock up a stomach that's good
and sick. Now push it into your body. Now, a stomach that's
sick and push it into your body, and a stomach that's sick
and put it into your body. Now, let's mock up a couple of
stomachs that are sick. Oh, you can't get two. Well, get
two in a row. All right, couple more. Okay. Feel better
now? "Okay. Now let's spot some spots in the room."
Bang-bang. Bang. Rrr. Rrr.... Bang. "All right, let's mock
up another stomach now, and push it into your body. And
another stomach. Now let's mock up a stomach that is
vomiting violently. Oh, you can get that real good. All
right, well, put that into your stomach. And so on. And
another one and another one and another one. Now see if you
can't get them in two at a time. Oh, you can still get them
in two - one after the... Well, that's all right. Push in a
few more.

"All right, now let's spot some space here. Let's spot the
space of the room. Bing-bing-bing~bing~bing. Bing. Bing.
Rrrr! Well, you say, "Get another stomach now, and see if
you can't get this one really violently vomiting."

"Oh, yes, I can get that fine now." "Now let's see if you
can get two of them." "Yeah. Yeah, I can get two of them."

"All right. Get two more and push them in and two more and
push them in and two more and push them in. Good, good.
Fine. Now can you get three of them? Oh, you can't. Well,
let's spot some spots in the room." Bing-bing-bing-bing.
"Now, let's see if we can't really spot a spot in space
now, okay?" Bing-bing-bing-bing-bing-bing-bing-bing...
"Yes, yes, yes. You know, things are getting a lot
brighter!" Bing-bing-bing. B-mmmm. Bing. Rrrr!

"Well, now, let's see if you can't get three stomachs out
there in front of you." "Yeah."
"Well, push it in. Get four." "Yeah."

"Push them in. Now see if you can get four of them around
you so that they sort of make a square around the body."

"Yup. Yup. Yeah, I can do that." "Push them in." "They're
awful thin, though. I can hardly see them at all. You know
that, now. You know I really don't see them well." "No, no.
That's okay. That's fine. Just get them out there, just so
you can see them slightly. Push them in some more. Push
them in some more, and push them in. Okay."

Golly, you know, this fellow, about this time, he knows
something is happening. And he'd better, and he would. I
don't care how fancy you were getting or how you were
changing his space or what else you were doing, if you even
vaguely work the case at all, you're going to be referring
him to space or referring him to havingness, in this last
one, or referring him to ideas.

Now, you don't really have to pay much attention to this,
if you just work in ideas like in 8-C, some of the steps in
8-C. But every time it says, "Put something out away from
you now or "Spot some places" or anything like that, boy,
you're right there into the problem of havingness and space.

And of course we just avoid energy, because energy is space
on the way to becoming havingness or havingness on the way
to becoming space. So of course your preclear's going to
get flows as you process this. They'll just go wham, wham,
wham, wham. Occasionally, he'll be having the aurora
borealis and a seventeen-gun salute going off simultaneously. 
Flows, flows, flows. They're flowing out, they're flowing in, 
they're flowing this way, they're flowing that way - skip 
them. So what?

If an automaticity shows up that is so startling that he
doesn't know what in the dickens happened, have him
duplicate it - bing, bing, bing - duplicate it, duplicate it,
duplicate it, duplicate it, duplicate it. And he says, "Oh,
devil with it," and go on with the process.

The only reason you handle these automaticities is
sometimes you coast by them and ignore them. You know, some
terrific automaticity - he says, "You know, a Roman candle
just appeared in front of my face and fired twelve times?"

And you as an auditor say, "Well, go on and spot some spots
in space."

He says, "Hell, the guy isn't interested in me." And he
objects to this. He'll stay there kind of determinedly with
the Roman candle. So if you'll pay some attention to the
Roman candle, why, he'll go on processing.

But sometimes you could process him for another hour after
that with his case making no progress. Why? He's waiting
for you to notice the Roman candle. So you just... the way
you solve that, in any event: something comes up, he says,
"You know, we were just spotting places where nuns would be
safe, and you know, they're all... they're all... they're
all on fire. You know, all of them are on fire. What do you
know about that?"

And you say, That's very interesting." Actually, you don't
give a damn, really. I mean, basically, as far as the
process is concerned, that all the nuns lit on fire might
mean that you had just run into his essential... part of
his life as Torquemada or something of the sort. But we're
not interested particularly in this, because all kinds of
engrams will turn on as you handle and remedy space. All
kinds of them will. So we don't pay any attention to this
particularly.

But he seems quite bemused and amazed by this, and
sometimes the preclear will just sit there dully, you know,
not responding for a little while. You've asked him to do
something, you've said, "Spot some more spots in space" - 
obviously it wasn't something that should give him a 
communication lag - and he just sits there.

You ask him after a moment, "What you doing?"

And "Well," he says, "all these nuns just caught on fire."
He says, "They're all over the place." He said, "And
they're burning and so forth."

"Well, why don't you mock up a bunch more nuns on fire?
Okay. And a bunch more. A lot more, and lot more."

"Yeah," he says. "Yeah," he says. "Now, spot some spots in
space," you say.

In other words, let's remember this: When it comes to space
and havingness, you are essentially involved with
attention. When it comes to a viewpoint you're essentially
involved with attention, and if you get this guy into a
position where his attention is fixed on some phenomena - 
which good, bad or indifferent, these phenomena have bemused 
him - you've of course got his attention out here. It's 
actually practically in present time. It isn't necessary 
that you've restimulated an old attention fixation. He's 
just interested. And he's so interested that he's making 
the space he's making. He's not doing the process you're 
doing. So remember attention. It ties in with making of 
space.

Okay. Now let's run just a little bit further afield. Let's
get a very old and basic process. Let's take SOP 8, Step V.
That is exteriorization by moving scenery under the
preclear. You have him move scenery under himself until he
exteriorizes. Well, this works all right without Remedy of
Havingness, if - if; if, if - he isn't a very critical case. 
If his havingness is critical, you've just started to run
Change of Space Processing on him.

You said, "Move New York under you. Move London under you.
Move New York under you. Move London under you. Move - And
he starts to say, "Nrrryyow. Ugh." His case'll bog, because
you are actually change of space processing.

If you were to run this Change of Space Processing as a
group process, why, you would have yourself the most
amazing results in the group. Several of them, the occluded
cases, would leave. Very amazing results. You start to
process this group, the cases that are worst off in the
group simply depart. The second you start to run Change of
Space or run in too much space on them as a group process,
the ones that are bad off will leave. Because in a group it
is very difficult to remedy havingness. And the only hole
in group processing is the Remedy of Havingness. 

We can group process as long as we don't too violently upset
people's havingness. And if we do, let's have an emergency
auditor aside and the emergency auditor should make it his
first business to recognize that what the group auditor did
was reduce this preclear's havingness beyond tolerance.
Therefore, the group emergency auditor, distinct from the
group auditor - the emergency auditor is the guy that reaches
into the group and grabs the guy or picks him up as he
races for the door or something of the sort and gets him
into a side room and fixes him up and pushes him back into
the group again. It's just a patch-up job. He isn't trying
to do anything for the case just beyond patching it up.

He should remedy - the group emergency auditor - should remedy
the preclear's havingness. That is to say, get something he
can mock up and have him pull it in several times. Optimum,
of course, is just to mock up anchor points. But there are
so many people that can't mock up anchor points, that you
have to go into Acceptance Level Processing. If they can't
mock up an anchor point, you have to go into Acceptance
Level Processing.

All right. So we have this process - SOP 8, Step V - where 
we have "Move these cities under you." Back and forth, back
and forth, city, city, city, city, city, city, city, city,
city - Change of Space, remember. You just keep your eye on
the preclear. And the next thing you know you're going to
see a muscle twitch. Or the E-Meter is going to come up and
go nyu-dth-dth-dth-dth-dthdth - rigid.

Well, as a matter of fact, you're a very, very poor auditor
if you didn't notice it till the E-Meter told you. I hate
to say that about E-Meters, because they detect an awful
lot and they take a lot of strain off of an auditor. But if
you didn't notice you were taking his havingness apart
before the E-Meter stuck, you're dull. You're not on the
ball at all.

Now, because why? As he does this, you will notice a
growing body tension. You're just running him fresh out of
havingness, you know? And he's started to pull in all kinds
of engrams which are just waiting out here a foot or two
from him or a little ways away but not particularly
hurtful. And the second you start to run some space into
his case - in other words, change these cities around...
You know, distance - any time we start to handle distance,
any time we start to spot space we are actually making the
case unhave. And the tension comes up in the person, in
the preclear, quite rapidly. And you'll notice that the
threshold of havingness - that is to say, the threshold of
remedy was what you're looking for; you're waiting for this
threshold of remedy to appear, you know - it appears, and 
you remedy the havingness.

And when you first started processing him, you found that
doggone thing appearing every three or four minutes. The
threshold was right there. And then pretty soon, it's every
ten minutes. And then pretty soon it's every half-hour. And
then pretty soon it's every couple of hours, and it's not
until you get him exteriorized and are really chasing him
around... Remember, you have to remedy havingness in ratio
to the amount of space you're giving him, and you start
giving him Change of Space all over the MEST universe,
brother, do you tear havingness apart in a hurry. And so,
as a result you have to remedy it in proportion to the
amount of space you're giving him. But as far as just
ordinary processing is concerned, maybe Reach and Withdraw
on the childhood home - that's a space process, you see -
Reach and Withdraw childhood home; he ran, ran and then got
a little tenser and a little tenser. And you says, "Okay.
Now let's see if we can't get some kind of a mock-up. What
kind of a mock-up can you get?"

And he says, "What's a mock-up?" And you say, "Oh, an image
picture of some sort or another. Well, what kind of one can
you get?" He says, "Oh, I don't know. I get this one I'm
looking at all the time. And it seems to have gotten closer
to me," he will say also. "Well, what one is that?" "Oh,
that's my grandfather's face in the coffin." "Well, why
don't you mock up a terrifically decayed grandfather." 

Always make your mock-up worse, for such preclears, than he
mentioned. That's the rule of thumb. What he mentioned to
you is the suspended state of havingness. He can't quite
have it. So you make it worse and it'll snap in.

So let's have a decayed grandfather, okay? One particularly
with some worms on him or some decayed flesh, something
like that. And have him... The preclear will go
"Nyarrr-oohh" - he doesn't want this, see? But snap, snap,
snap, snap, snap - he's been staring at a picture of his
grandfather's face in the coffin for the last ten years!
You knocked it out with five or ten commands to mock up
things and pull them in.

You don't even consider this remarkable because that's not
your goal. Your goal is freedom and the antithesis of
freedom is restriction. And energy in suspension or in
terms of havingness is in itself restriction. So therefore
you're trying to free him out of this restrictive circumstance. 
He will note phenomena occurring and will be quite satisfied 
one way or the other.

So we get into the other phase of what you do if you want
to be a howling success as an auditor, is you set a goal
for the session which you know you can achieve with the
techniques which you can work on this preclear.

All right. You set some kind of a little minor goal. It's
just an obvious thing. Usually you don't set it before you
process the preclear. You process him for a minute or two
and then set it. And say, "Well, we're going to do
so-and-so with this boy." And then you just go on and
process him until you do it - something very simple. And 
when you have done it, why, end of session.

And that way it gives you a cycle of action every time -
not that you're delicate - but it makes him happy with you as
an auditor. And most of the reasons preclears get unhappy
with auditors is really not really even communication
breaks or anything like that. It's because the auditor
never seems to have a finite end of the session. He never
tries to really get anything accomplished in the session.
He never considers that it's up there and accomplished.
And after a while the preclear gets the idea of no end of
processing.

So let's take a case just in point. And I'll describe this
case to you at some little length. Processed this case
yesterday morning. Just grabbed him for your benefit and
processed him, because this case didn't even come in the
"What fog?" category that we put all Los Angeles people in.
We got this case into the office because it was one of the
doctor diploma cases of an auditor. And he was incautious
enough to bring a real bad-off case into the office in
there, right at the moment when I was fishing around for a
case to demonstrate a process on. Not for anybody, I just
wanted to process this case so that I would give you a
little accurate rundown on exactly one case.

Now, this fellow has been around for a long time, this case
has. He's a nice guy, actually. But he's been around for an
awful long time. Nothing much has happened in his case.
He's been processed by many auditors; many auditors have
been interested in him. The auditor has picked him up for a
doctorate case - see, no fee involved in the thing (it
doesn't matter one way or the other whether a fee is
involved for a doctorate case) - but he picked him up and
intended to turn him in.

Well, this fellow had been processed, I know, by about five
different auditors. His case always gets a tiny little bit
better - tiny little bit better. Obviously there's something
wrong with the processes which have been given to this
case. This case is wearing thick glasses; the eyes and so
forth are very, very squinted - they're a tiny little slit,
usually, visible of the eyes; body sort of driven all the
time and a marked and heavy tension on the case, you know.
"Don't quite know where we're going, but we're liable to
jump in any direction at any instant." And at the same
time, "Can't really see where we're going to jump to, on
account of we can't see." This kind of an attitude.

Well, this case was a setup for what I wanted, and so I
processed this case for about an hour and a half. It's very
interesting to process a case for an hour and a half these
days. I mean, that's a long time. And you haven't yet maybe
learned that, but that is.

But this case was so deficient in terms of havingness that
he was in a continual state of fly-out-of-the-room - the 
kind of an acute state that you'll occasionally put somebody
into in a Group Processing session. He all of a sudden
can't hold his legs still, he feels he's going to shake
himself to pieces and he's going to run away.

Well, this boy was in that state day after day after day
after day, which makes an interesting thing that he was
still amongst us. What'd we do with this case? To get the
case's interest... I didn't even tell him I was going to
process him. I snuck up on him - didn't have any time to 
put any brakes on. You wouldn't ordinarily do that as an
auditor. It's sometimes quite effective. Also it
occasionally upsets their self-determinism. They all of a
sudden find themselves being processed and they didn't
consent to be processed. This upsets them. But this fellow
is below the range of consent. There's the age of consent,
and there's the place of consent on the Tone Scale. And the
place of consent on the Tone Scale is above 2.5. You are
perfectly in your rights as an auditor to kneel on somebody
with both knees and process them anyplace below that,
consent or no consent.

Well, anyway, he start... he came in and he was squinting
around at this and that. So I said to him, "Take your
glasses off and get the idea of how nice it is, all that
blurred scenery. Just get the idea of enjoying all that
blurred scenery." Guy hadn't even talked about processing,
but he did. Gnng! What did I tell him to do, you see? I
said, "Look at some space." -vvbomm. "Now, let's just be
calm about it, now. Now just take a look without your
glasses" - and his eyes crossed. And almost crossed over 
a cross. That's how scarce he was on energy. His eyes just
went in - whang!

So I said, "Well, all right now, let's read this book." You
know, a little havingness. See, this is real sneaky sort of
processing. "Now, where's this book comfortable in front of
you, there?"

"Oh, ... " - dong. He got it about five inches away from his
eyes. After I'd been processing him for a very short time on
that, he says, "You say, 'Where is it comfortable?' It's
comfortable down in the South Pacific. As long as you had
your face in a book, you didn't have to know what was going
on out there. You were the other guy." He explains all this
to me. No real significance, because his case isn't in a
kind of a state whereby anything like that would spring by
itself. But he recognized it - that he was buried in a book
to escape reality - right there. Bang. Good. Fine.

"Now," I said, "let's take a look at the scenery and get
the idea of enjoying a blurred point of view. What if
everything were blurred? What if this book here were
blurred, all fuzzy. Get the idea that it's printed in
cotton batting."

"Oh, uh..." - blonng. See? And I made my own statement of
what we were going to do in this session. This was just
monkey business up to this point, see. But I made my
postulate, what we are going to do in this session. And
what we're going to do in this session is make it so this
man can relax. This man has probably not relaxed for ten
years. So let's fix him up so he can relax. Now, how are we
going to have to do that? He's going to have to be able,
obviously, to have some space.

"Okay. All right. Let's mock up a pair of eyeballs that
aren't good. Bad eyeballs." Bing. Bing. Yeah, sure. Oh,
boy, could he get those.

"Crushed," he says.

'All right." I says, "Well, get them with the juice running
out of them."

And he says, "Okay. Oh," he says, "but that makes me
awfully sick at my stomach." 

And I said, "Well, get a stomach that's vomiting." 

"Okay. Oh," he says, "it's awfully bruised," he says. 
"It's sure vomiting, too."

Yes, he could get that easily. That didn't surprise him.
This was one of the first times he ever got a mock-up. But
it was so sudden, and it seemed so natural to him, that...
You see why? I never had an... I never let him make the
postulate, "I can't get a mock-up." I just handed him two
he could get. Obviously, he had a tense stomach, so he
could get a bunged-up stomach. He had bad eyes, so he could
get two bad eyes. So we just got streams of these things
coming in, see. Streams of them. And we got more and more
of them, and more and more of them, more and more of them,
and boy, he started to get into a state where he was going
to throw up any second.

And he says, "If you keep this up any longer," he says,
"I'm just going to throw up right here in your office."

Well now, look at this, auditor. If I had stopped that and
had told him to spot some space, he would have thrown up.
In other words, your control over a preclear, if you know
your stuff, practically monitors his autonomic nervous
system. You could just change the process and make him
throw up, just like that. You could stop the havingness...
See, throw up. He's going to get tense, you know? Tension.
He's going to push away energy of some kind or another;
energy manifestations are going to occur here.

Well, the thing to do is, of course, give him more
havingness. So we just got stomachs vomiting twice as hard,
and eyes which were really squashed at the same time we
were getting the stomachs and so on. We got that, you know?
Mock it up, shove it in. Mock it up, shove it in. Mock it
up, shove it in - more and more and more and more.

"Okay. Now let's get an idea of a nice, blurred viewpoint,
now." You see? That's a covert method of saying, "Some
space, fellow. Now we got some space."

Okay. He looks around and he says, "Zznn." But you know,
his eyes didn't go bong - they didn't cross. You see, as you
remedy the space you put him into a position where he's got
to create some havingness. So then you ask him to make some
havingness, observe or make some space, and gradually he
shakes off the top of the curve so that he isn't just
burning up his bank.

And that's what you're trying to get him out of - burning 
his bank up. You're trying to get him out to a point where 
he just creates all the space and all the energy that anybody
could possibly want or need freely, without having to
remedy anything. And that's your goal.

Well, the goal with this fellow is let's get him into such
a condition that he can actually stand there, draw a long
breath and say, "It's a nice day." In other words, relax
and enjoy the relaxation. Let's get him in that state.

So therefore we have to spot a little space, observe that
blurred room and look out this way or that way, you know? A
little space, and then we have to keep giving him this body.

Now, you could say actually, if you'd been watching the
session, you'd have said, "Ron is knocking out a specific
engram out of this case." Because that's... we only worked
with one engram. Only, boy, did we get lots of it. And I
don't even know that I knocked it out of the case. The
fellow accidentally has been in it for years. I didn't
care whether he was ever in this engram or not or what
engram was turning up. It made no difference to me at all.
If it had been a different engram or a dozen different
engrams, I would have used them equally fast, just to do
these other two things, you know. Just remedy his
havingness by making him condense masses into himself and
expand by having him spot space.

Well, we worked it up to a point of where he was getting a
dead body, or a body that was dying, which was still being
kicked and punished, its eyes smashed in. Couple of engrams
flashed through, by the way - galley slave hit over the back
of the head and knocked across his oar, so forth. He's told
auditors about these things before. His interest in them
is quite great, merely because they're an interesting
curiosa. Didn't cut any ice with me. I just ignored the
whole thing, just by saying, "Yeah, that's real interesting. 
Good. Good. Now, let's get that dead body there with the 
squashed eyes and the stomach and so forth. And, you know, 
get the idea of its space being knocked in and being kicked 
and so on."

"Oh, yes," he says, "I certainly can get that. You know,"
he says, "that's all the space there is. Right there!" He
said, "That's all the space there is - right there! Yes sir."

Did I say, "Well good, we've solved something with this
case." Hell, no. We didn't care about that at all. So I
said, "Well, pick up the dead body and put it in yourself
there, and get another one now with its face all knocked in
and put that in, and another one with its face knocked in
and put that in, and another one and another one and
another one and another one and another one and another
one and..."

"Gee," he says, "that sure is relaxed." And then all of a
sudden went into a terrific line charge. He had at last
found something that was relaxed. I never told him my goal
in the processing, see. He had found something relaxed.
There's nothing quite as relaxed as a dead body. And this
individual, in order not to be dead, of course, had to go
around being terrifically tense.

But that is the basic mechanism of life - it wasn't just in
this engram, see. But this satisfied him a great deal, and
I got him to look at some more space and mock up some more
dead bodies and look at some more space and mock up some
more dead bodies, and the next thing you know he was
rejecting his glasses rather impatiently. He was taking
them off his nose and shoving them onto the desk, and then
picking them up and putting them on. I finally had to tell
him to put his glasses on so he could see better because
he's looking around and squinting. You know, we weren't... 
we hadn't gotten this case completely out of the woods,
but we had this case in such a state that the fellow could
relax, and that was the goal of the session. So we just
ended it right there. First time the guy's relaxed,
probably, in the last ten years. So he's relaxed. Good.
Goal of session.

This individual, quite unwittingly, has moved further out
from the peak of the MEST universe curve of
create-survive-destroy, moved further out from the peak of
survive, a little bit closer to being able to create and
destroy. By doing what? Some space, some condensation. Some
space, some condensation. Now, if I'd asked him to move
his childhood home under him or anything as far out as
that, this individual would have thrown up. Because that
was too much for the case. So auditor judgment enters in
here. This fellow can get fairly good mock-ups. He can mock
up anchor points and pull them in on himself, he can do
several of these little items, so on.

Well, let's change space all over the place. He can't quite
exteriorize. Well, he will very shortly. So we just have
him spot places in space, pull areas under him - anything
you want. You can do anything you want to do with a case,
but every one of these processes that is successful lies on
these three items: postulates, space, havingness.

And postulates, of course, depend upon Universe Processing,
which is a slightly different thing than what we've just
been talking about simply because we're changing universes
around all the time. But we still have to occasionally
remedy havingness with Universe Processing.

But if you audit against that background, you will audit
successfully; and if you don't, you will have failures.

(end of lecture)
_


